Three Categories of Secessionist Acts
第20條- Act 1: Separating the HKSAR or any other part of the PRC from the PRC. Definition
- Act 2: Altering by unlawful means the legal status of the HKSAR or any other part of the PRC. Definition
- Act 3: Surrendering the HKSAR or any other part of the PRC to a foreign country. Definition
- Key feature: Article 20 expressly states "whether or not by force or threat of force" — no force is needed for conviction, unlike the subversion offence in Article 22. Trap
- All three acts require the intent to commit secession or undermine national unification. Exam
高頻考點
The "whether or not by force" phrase is unique to Article 20. Article 22 requires force, threat of force, or other unlawful means — this contrast is a top MC trap.
易混淆
Article 20 lists 3 acts; Article 22 lists 4 acts. Exam questions have appeared as "select all" with all three Art 20 acts as the correct answer.
常見陷阱
Real exam questions have tested the trap claim that force is required for secession — the answer is false: Article 20 expressly states force is NOT required.
How it is examined
Which of the following are acts listed under Article 20 (secession) — regardless of whether force is used?
- All three are correct: (i) separating HK from PRC; (ii) altering HK's legal status unlawfully; (iii) surrendering HK to foreign rule
- All require intent to commit secession or undermine national unification
- No force required — "whether or not by force or threat of force" (unique to Art 20)
- Any one of the three acts is sufficient for the offence
Which statement about the secession offence (Art 20) is FALSE?
- False: "Force or threat of force is required for secession" — Art 20 expressly states force is NOT required
- True: Any one of the three acts suffices (separation, altering legal status, foreign rule)
- True: The key distinction vs subversion (Art 22) is the means requirement
- True: Subversion (Art 22) requires force, threat of force, or other unlawful means